Notes from the „FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt (about SOA, Apache Camel, Active MQ, Service Mix ESB)

“FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt

On May 25th 2010, I attended the „FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt, Germany. That is a free one day conference, where some important open source projects of Apache are presented by Fuse – a company which offers commercial support for versions based on these products.

Which products were presented?

FUSE presented especially the following three products:

–       Camel: A lightweight framework which implements the common Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP).

–       Active MQ: A message queuing software.

–       Service Mix. An Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), which uses for instance Camel and Active MQ.

My Impressions about this conference

My impressions of this one day conference were very positive:

–       About 50 developers came to listen to committers of these projects. The committers also discussed a lot with the people after the presentations.

–       The products were presented vendor-neutral: No advertisements or reasons why you should use these products instead of some from other vendors. That fact really surprised me!

–       Besides, some employees of external companies presented their experiences with these products in large projects.

–       Although the conference was for free, the location was really great (nice hotel and conference room, very good lunch, coffee, cakes, drinks, and so on).

Conclusion

My conclusion: I really like Camel and Active MQ, both are very interesting products.

–       Camel: Easy to use for routing and transformation (e.g.  to route from MQ to File or from Active MQ to WebSphere MQ).

–       Active MQ: A good alternative to expensive commercial products such as WebSphere MQ. Meanwhile it offers high scalability and availability to work stabile in productive systems.

–       Service Mix: I do not like the idea to use this ESB (the current version 4 now uses OSGI instead of JBI) , so it is not lightweight and not easy to use. I would probably prefer either a lightwight open source ESB such as WSO2 ESB (which is based on Synapse) or Mule ESB or if a lightweight ESB does not make any sense, I would choose a commercial product with a graphical user interface.

The slides are avaiable at http://fusesource.com/fuse/fuse-osc-day051409/.

Probably I will attend the next „FUSE Community Day“ in a reachable area, too. Maybe this blog entry eases the decision wheter you will also attend…

Best regards,

Kai Wähner

Kai Waehner

bridging the gap between technical innovation and business value for data integration, workflow orchestration, and agentic AI.

Recent Posts

Industrial IoT Landscape Q4 2026: The Plant Floor Is Becoming Software

The Industrial IoT Landscape Q4 2026 maps vendors and open source from edge to cloud…

11 hours ago

Unified Orchestration in Telecom: One Control Plane Across OSS, BSS, and IT

Telecom has more orchestration standards than any other industry, and the maturity stops at the…

7 days ago

Jev by TypeSafe AI in Workflow Orchestration and Process Intelligence

Jev by TypeSafe AI returns a calibrated probability instead of text. In a workflow that…

2 weeks ago

Why Jev by TypeSafe AI Fits Apache Kafka and Flink Better Than LLMs

Jev by TypeSafe AI returns typed decisions with calibrated probabilities in a few hundred milliseconds.…

2 weeks ago

How System One Models Like Jev Change Enterprise AI Architecture

System One models such as Jev by TypeSafe AI answer typed questions with calibrated probabilities…

2 weeks ago

From Cron Batch Jobs to Kestra: Migrating a Python Script Without a Rewrite

A working Python cron job moved to Kestra, the open source workflow orchestration platform, without…

3 weeks ago