Notes from the „FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt (about SOA, Apache Camel, Active MQ, Service Mix ESB)

“FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt

On May 25th 2010, I attended the „FUSE Community Day 2010“ in Frankfurt, Germany. That is a free one day conference, where some important open source projects of Apache are presented by Fuse – a company which offers commercial support for versions based on these products.

Which products were presented?

FUSE presented especially the following three products:

–       Camel: A lightweight framework which implements the common Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP).

–       Active MQ: A message queuing software.

–       Service Mix. An Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), which uses for instance Camel and Active MQ.

My Impressions about this conference

My impressions of this one day conference were very positive:

–       About 50 developers came to listen to committers of these projects. The committers also discussed a lot with the people after the presentations.

–       The products were presented vendor-neutral: No advertisements or reasons why you should use these products instead of some from other vendors. That fact really surprised me!

–       Besides, some employees of external companies presented their experiences with these products in large projects.

–       Although the conference was for free, the location was really great (nice hotel and conference room, very good lunch, coffee, cakes, drinks, and so on).

Conclusion

My conclusion: I really like Camel and Active MQ, both are very interesting products.

–       Camel: Easy to use for routing and transformation (e.g.  to route from MQ to File or from Active MQ to WebSphere MQ).

–       Active MQ: A good alternative to expensive commercial products such as WebSphere MQ. Meanwhile it offers high scalability and availability to work stabile in productive systems.

–       Service Mix: I do not like the idea to use this ESB (the current version 4 now uses OSGI instead of JBI) , so it is not lightweight and not easy to use. I would probably prefer either a lightwight open source ESB such as WSO2 ESB (which is based on Synapse) or Mule ESB or if a lightweight ESB does not make any sense, I would choose a commercial product with a graphical user interface.

The slides are avaiable at http://fusesource.com/fuse/fuse-osc-day051409/.

Probably I will attend the next „FUSE Community Day“ in a reachable area, too. Maybe this blog entry eases the decision wheter you will also attend…

Best regards,

Kai Wähner

Kai Waehner

bridging the gap between technical innovation and business value for data integration, workflow orchestration, and agentic AI.

Recent Posts

Data Integration vs Workflow Orchestration: Connecting Systems Is Not Coordinating the Work

Data integration and workflow orchestration get confused because both ship hundreds of connectors. This post…

6 days ago

Process Intelligence Landscape 2026: Mining, Orchestration, and the Agentic AI Shift

Process intelligence has become three things, not one: mining, orchestration, and a decision gate. Here…

2 weeks ago

When to Use AMQP, JMS, Kafka, or MQTT: Trade-offs, Not a Winner

AMQP, JMS, Kafka, and MQTT get compared as rivals, but a message broker, a log,…

2 weeks ago

Kafka vs Flink vs Spark: Do You Really Need Real-Time?

Most vendors sell milliseconds, but most enterprise use cases do not need them. A critical…

3 weeks ago

Edge to Cloud and Back: Four Data Movement Problems, and Why One Technology Never Solves All of Them

Edge to cloud is not one integration problem. It is four: telemetry going up, control…

3 weeks ago

Data Integration Landscape 2026: Event Streaming, API, and Batch in the Era of Agentic AI

The Data Integration Landscape 2026 maps every major vendor across three communication paradigms: request-response, event-driven,…

4 weeks ago