Spoilt for Choice: How to Choose the Right Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)?

I had a very interesting talk at OOP 2013 in Germany. OOP is a great conference for software architects and decision makers. The topic of my talk was “Spoilt for Choice: How to Choose the Right Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)”. Hereby, I want to share the slides with you…

I had a very interesting talk at OOP 2013 in Germany. OOP is a great conference for software architects and decision makers. The topic of my talk was “Spoilt for Choice: How to Choose the Right Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)”. Hereby, I want to share the slides with you…

Abstract

Data exchanges in and between companies increase a lot. The number of applications which must be integrated increases, too. As solution, an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) can be used in almost every integration project – no matter which technologies, transport protocols, data formats, or environments such as Java or .NET are used. All integration projects can be realized in a consistent way without redundant boilerplate code. However, an ESB offers many further features, such as business process management (BPM), master data management, business activity monitoring, or big data. Plenty of ESB products are on the market which differ a lot regarding concepts, programming models, tooling, and open source vs. proprietary. Really one is spoilt for choice.

Learnings

This session shows and compares ESB alternatives and discusses their pros and cons. Besides, a recommendation will be given when to use just a lightweight framework for a specific problem such as systems integration or BPM instead of a (too) powerful ESB. You will also learn what an integration suite is, how it differs from an ESB, and when to use which alternative.

Slides

Here are the slides of my session:

Click on the button to load the content from www.slideshare.net.

Load content

Feel free to tell me your opinions in the comments. I appreciate every feedback!

 

Best regards,

Kai Wähner (Twitter: @KaiWaehner)

Dont‘ miss my next post. Subscribe!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.
If you have issues with the registration, please try a private browser tab / incognito mode. If it doesn't help, write me: kontakt@kai-waehner.de

You May Also Like
Durable Execution Engine with Restate Temporal DBOS vs Stream Processing with Kafka Streams Apache Flink Spark Structured Streaming
Read More

­­The Rise of the Durable Execution Engine (Temporal, Restate) in an Event-driven Architecture (Apache Kafka)

Durable execution engines like Temporal and Restate are redefining how developers orchestrate long-running, stateful workflows in distributed systems. Unlike traditional BPM tools focused on human-centric tasks, these engines automate machine-to-machine processes with built-in durability, retries, and fault-tolerant coordination. When integrated with event-driven platforms like Apache Kafka, they enable scalable, resilient architectures—handling complex business logic such as order processing, fraud detection, and multi-step transactions. This blog explores their capabilities, differences from stream processing tools like Apache Flink, Kafka Streams or Spark Structured Streaming, and the emerging role they play in modern enterprise infrastructure.
Read More